I came across an article today called,
"Do Atheists Borrow Religion's Morality?" Basically, the article tries to show that the values of atheists--such as care for the environment--have a moral basis. It seems likely that this moral basis has its origins from our Creator.
This is a common argument against atheism and nothing new. The New Atheism, however, does not really have any new arguments against God's existence. They simply have vivid, recent events that they draw upon to speak of the "evils" of religion, such as 9/11.
What is new about the New Atheism is its aggressiveness. Atheists are no longer hiding their beliefs, but are organizing on the Internet, supporting one another online, and pooling resources and social support to take their message of atheism to the public, with billboards, T-Shirts, and of course, books.
So, Christians ought to learn or re-learn the traditional arguments for God's existence. However, these are unlikely to be very successful in converting most atheists, particularly if used alone. The entry point for reaching atheists may still be loving them and inviting them into community, and then seeking to answer the intellectual questions.
Whatever the order, few are argued into the kingdom of heaven. Arguments for God's existence seem to be more affirming to Christians than they are an effective evangelistic strategy. But sharing, through personal narrative, why we believe in God and the impact that he has had upon our lives can be effective. At the least, it usually gains us an audience.
How do you think we can reach atheists today?