Today I received a call from a dear woman who has a sweet spirit and tender openness towards God. I had added her to one of our outreach groups, as I felt that she had a heart for reaching broken people with love and tenderness.
She mentioned that I had put her in that group. I said, yes--but if she did not want to be in it, she could just drop out. She said, no, she was touched by this, that she had often wanted to have a valued role in ministry, but had had those desires squelched because she was a woman. But she was feeling a call, using language like, "born again." What she was describing was a spiritual awakening in her life.
And in something that surely is not coincidence, when she called, I was reading from a book called Christianity After Religion: The Death of Church and the Birth of a New Spiritual Awakening by Diana Bass, with plans to write this blog post on this very topic.
Since our fellowship (Churches of Christ) chooses to be "ahistorical" (we don't care what Alexander Campbell believed, Martin Luther, or anyone else--we just follow the Bible--is our rather naive saying), many church leaders are unaware of or give little credence to the various Spiritual awakenings in American history.
But these historical events ought to be noted, for they give us insight into what is happening in our world today, and what will happen in the future. The comments below reflect insights and research from Christianity After Religion, with my own application to our fellowship.
There are three generally recognized "Great Awakenings" in American History:
Bass cites William McLouglin, who proposes that we are now in a 4th Great Awakening, a time which began in the 1960s. This awakening could be called many things--a shift from a modern worldview to a postmodern world, a shift from church to Jesus (for Christians), or a shift from institutional religion to spirituality.
These movements are a mixed bag, as they always have excesses. The current spiritual awakening, for instance, has seen the excesses of "religion" in 9/11, and now some 15-20% of the population are agnostic, atheistic, or simply not claiming any form of religion.
But in general, these awakenings have brought about spiritual renewal, as they have critiqued the religion of their age and sought to find a better or more complete answer to the longing in our souls. The pattern that bass identifies in these awakenings is the following:
These Great Awakenings appear to be God initiated in many ways, or God at least used them, to end ineffective and out of step leadership models, show the importance of the Holy Spirit, value women, end slavery and begin the civil rights movement, and more.
In this book, Bass also goes through the three aspects of the psychology of religion--believing, behaving, and belonging, and she shows how the progression of religion and spirituality today is first, belonging (Jesus called the disciples together before he taught them), behaving (Jesus sent out the disciples to proclaim the kingdom and heal the sick, before they truly understood who he was), and believing (finally, Peter confesses that Jesus is the Christ--but still does not fully understand this until the resurrection).
So what does this awakening mean for Churches of Christ? How can we look through this cultural maelstrom and not only survive, but thrive? Here are some predictions of how a small group of churches are or will seek to adapt and respond to the Spirit's leading and the culture's legitimate critiques.
How do you think that churches and individuals should respond to this 4th Great Awakening? What should be kept or emphasized, and what should be jettisoned or de-emphasized?
Comment
George, thank you for your comments and feedback. Yes, I used to have a very thick New Members class curriculum. While I think that it was theologically based and fairly balanced, I have gone towards a much more holistic "follow-up" study to a follow-up set of missional and discipleship practices, learning as they live a life on mission.
Most of the time we never get to praxis in our teaching, even when it is good/healthy teaching.
James, I think this is a good piece. While I did not read it to critique it, I sense it is well balanced. I believe we must keep the simplicity of the gospel. The gospel is about Jesus and that can not rightly be changed in any way,as I see it. Some of the church thing we hold on to as if we had book, chapter and verse for are crusty years of tradition and we must look and re-look at these. We need to move out of majoring in minors. I try to explain it this way. Picture an Ice-Cream cone, big at the top and little at the bottom. Many, many people believe in God, Christ and even the church on the level of the most open large part of the cone. Then comes New Converts Class. (now we are moving deeper into the small part of the cone) Here is where we seek to teach them "sound doctrine" as we believe it to be. Problem is this sinks pretty quickly to things like "silence of Scripture," "Necessary inference, etc. while all those really great and needful doctrines like grace, faith and telling the good news to others. Long story short, we finally reach the bottom of the cone and we are calling doctrine the tiny thing that set apart congregation a from b. Eating in church meeting places, proper attire for worship, how many songs, even what kind of song, etc. This has to change or we are going belly up.
Thank you, dad. Yes, indeed, we seem to be stuck in an information transfer=transformation paradigm, which has proven to be false. We need more than knowledge for transformation. The churches that thrive in the future will get this.
Thanks, Ron! I appreciate you sharing your perspective!
This is a great article. Very well done. This is essentially a call to Biblical discipleship wherein every Christian is called to be a disciple and a disciple maker. Until recently this type of disciplemaking emphasis has, in my opinion, received scant attention within the Christian Churches and Churches of Christ. Anyway, thanks for sharing this preview of the next awakening. <>/p>
James, This an excellent post. I would suggest your point on Leadership is one of the most important. Eph 4 tells us that leaders are to "equip the saints for works of service." Surely one admonition is for any leadership to do this by finding other leaders. Another poiint is the change in character of Bible Classes. Giving information, the focus in bible classes for generations, neither equips for service nor does little to transform lives. The laboratory of experience couple with bible knowledge does transform lives. It is the practice of a thing that transforms one--however I might like to read about it and "learn." Jesus said if you know these things and do them, happy are you. Knowing alone just doesn't cut it.
12 members
19 members
20 members
35 members
57 members
57 members
46 members
93 members
48 members
29 members
© 2024 Created by James Nored. Powered by
You need to be a member of Missional Outreach Network for the Missional Church to add comments!
Join Missional Outreach Network for the Missional Church