Our new Missional Outreach Member (MON) member, M. Scott Boren, author of Missional Small Groups, has written a blog post called "What Missional Evangelism Is Not."
In the post, Scott relates an uncomfortable experience he had of sitting through a multi-level marketing presentation to the following small group experience.
This [multi-level marketing experience] made me think about Eli, the owner of a restaurant where our small group frequented. We would sit late at night, talking and drinking coffee. Over time, we developed a pretty good friendship with Eli, so much so that he invited Trey and I to go fishing with him in Galveston. After failing to catch anything, the three of us went to lunch. While eating shrimp, Trey proceeded to tell Eli all about Jesus. Obviously Eli was not interested in the conversation but Trey continued on with all the questions we were taught to ask when someone resists such a presentation. And the more Trey talked the more Eli squirmed. I wanted to reach over and pull Trey's tongue out, but Trey had mentored me in the past and I assumed he knew something that I did not. That day really messed up our friendship. Subsequent conversations with Eli were always met with resistance. I wonder if we made him feel like my friend Bob made me feel.I appreciate Scott's post here. But herein I would say is illustrated problems with both many in the missional camp as well as those in typical evangelical "evangelism." Typical evangelical evangelism is entirely presentational, concentrates only on a person's spirit (not their whole person), and it truncates the gospel to forgiveness of sins so that a person can go to heaven (nothing about present day life in the kingdom). In this example that Scott gives, the "missional" group only gets close enough to a person to give them a typical evangelical, one-way, evangelism presentation. This is a wrong approach, both culturally and biblically. We should care about people holistically, including all of their needs. We should not just get close enough to make a drive-by presentation and then wash our hands of people. We should not view them as a "notch on the belt," but rather people to be loved.
Honestly, Eli was an evangelism target. We had been taught to befriend people, share Jesus with people and to recruit them to participate in our small group. Of course no one put it in such crass terms, but I think this is the way Eli felt like we were treating him.
However, the typical evangelical evangelists do have one thing right--we do need to intentionally share Jesus with people and call them to acknowledge Jesus as Lord and live out this life. This is what some in the missional movement have missed. Michael Frost, in his excellent new work, The Road to Missional, says this: "Those who claim to be missional but who never ever find themselves in a relational place where they can proclaim the lordship of Jesus to a friend, even if that proclamation occurs over several conversations over a period of time, are hardly missional at all."
Some in the movement appear to be so concerned about the abusive evangelism of the past that they have jettisoned evangelism altogether. That it would be a violation of a relationship to make such a call.
That type of thinking is, quite frankly, ridiculous, and I'm glad that Frost has tackled this issue. (More on this later) It is not enough to just be in proximity with people. It is not loving to never share the gospel with people. And it is not wrong to intentionally share the gospel with people. In fact, because we love people and care about their souls, we must be intentional about this. There is a good way to go about this, however. In keeping with "missional outreach," this should be the approach to reaching non-Christians in missional small groups:
Is it wrong to be intentional about calling people to follow Jesus? When and where can and should a person do this?
Comment
Sorry to duplicate comments. Given the off-link for reading/reference, I desire that comments and interaction will occur here--not seeking to add another forum, just to give easy access to my reflections.
Seems that properly, biblically understood, all evangelism should be missional. The problem is that many past evangelism efforts have not been holistic or focused on the development of healthy Christians in restored God-relationships. Some of my reflections are in a blog on my website today: http://www.bobyoungresources.com/blog/?p=785 . Especially note the summaries under #3--God's desire/purpose, and #4--message. These are worthy of much more development and discussion. (Hope it is OK to off-link and not to reprint the same info in multiple places.)
I want to keep talking about this. Obviously this is your passion and I think we can can dialogue our way into something that advances the conversation. No worries about RN. I was only there for a day and was running around like a crazy man. I will let you know when I'm in Collin Co. next and maybe we can have coffee.
Thanks, Scott. It is great to find someone else wrestling with this. We definitely need to stay in dialogue, maybe get together and meet. It would be good to hear more of your story. We are all shaped by these events of our past, and we seek to correct or emphasize not only from the biblical text, but out of our own experience and what God's people are wrestling with.
I'm really sorry that I did not get over to see you at the RightNow conference. I went to as many of the lectures as I could, but I could not attend all of them (a very busy week). I'm glad that you know where our church building is. Next time you are in McKinney/Dallas, let's try to get together.
James, This is awesome. The idea of evangelism/outreach from a missional perspective is relatively undeveloped. Kinda weird! Part of it is related to a backlash that evangelicals have had to traditional forms of evangelism. Part of it is related to people focusing on the question of conversation vs. social justice, as if that's really the issue at stake (Ed Stetzer tends to focus on on these categories).
I'm wrestling with this because in the 1990s, I was part of an organization that taught about relationship evangelism, as opposed to older forms of it. But we did not take it far enough. Our evangelistic imagination was still shaped by a church growth paradigm, not a missional (redemption of creation by the Trinity) paradigm. While not very practical, this is where Craig Van Gelder's book The Evangelizing Church is helpful. It gives us some new language to help us attain a better imagination.
Let's keep up this dialogue. I've followed you for a while and see what you are doing. I think we have a very similar perspective.
In addition, I know exactly where your church is located. I don't know if you remember, but my childhood home sat on the corner of Virginia and Custer, right across from where the Home Depot now sits.
Thanks, Scott! I had wanted to dialogue with you about this, as there seem to be few wrestling with it and you are one of those. I just finished my D.Min. in "missional outreach," and the name of this site is the "missional outreach network." I thought about calling it missional evangelism, but I didn't want the negative baggage of the old style of evangelism coming to mind. (I actually cited you on this in my D.Min. paper) I have a holistic view of evangelism, which includes serving people in their areas of brokenness, whatever they are, and sharing the good news with them. The seeking part adds the missional, "go to them" aspect of this.
However, I am at heart an evangelist, in what I hope is the best sense of the word. (Churches of Christ are not, strictly speaking, evangelical, though we share some common commitments to Scripture and a desire for people to be saved.) And I hear virtually no one in the missional field talking about how to actually call people to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and be baptized into his name. That is why I was very glad to see Michael Frost come out with his Road to Missional and address this topic. Michael, by the way, is an evangelist too, and of course, deeply missional.
James,
This is very helpful. The reason that I'm wrestling with this is because there has been so little said about missional evangelism. Kinda funny huh? Then On top of this, the term "missional" has been slapped on top of traditional forms of evangelism. Michael Frost's new book The Road to Missional does some work on this, but I do think we need more. We need a thorough conversation about this. Is complex and has multiple layers.
Great thoughts! Thanks!
Thanks to Timothy Tien, by the way, for alerting me to Scott's post.
I can remember Alan Hirsch saying in a conversation that I had one time with him that he thought that the missional movement was weak on evangelism. That would be ironic, would it not? The reason, by the way, that I called this site missional outreach network and have used the term missional outreach, rather than missional evangelism, is due to some of the evangelistic abuses of the past. But we should not forget a true call to evangelism.
12 members
19 members
20 members
35 members
57 members
57 members
46 members
93 members
48 members
29 members
© 2025 Created by James Nored. Powered by
You need to be a member of Missional Outreach Network for the Missional Church to add comments!
Join Missional Outreach Network for the Missional Church